Case Study: Operations resource planning and budgeting for Office Facility Management
Overview:
Operations resource planning can be daunting for a facility manager, especially for a newly constructed corporate office facility with a footprint of over one million square feet. In this case, the Facility Manager should collaborate with the property owner, investors, end users, and other stakeholders to plan and estimate resource allocation and budgeting. The facility manager can implement sustainable solutions and ensure a comfortable work environment by carefully focusing on the business objectives, environmental boundary coordinates, and end users’ needs.
Context:
The office facility has been constructed to centralise operations across various regions at a single location, following the business’s sustainability policies and principles. Currently, the built facility operates at 70% of its designed capacity. A professional team has been awarded a service contract to manage and oversee ‘hard and soft’ services, which include cleaning, operational maintenance of amenities, event management, fleet management, landscaping, management of residential units, technological spaces, building maintenance services, ground maintenance, and environmental, health, and safety management.
Approach to Resource Planning and Budgeting in Facility Management:
We developed a facility management framework intricately designed to synchronise operational metrics with overarching business objectives. This comprehensive framework hinged on several key determinants:
1. Strategic Factors: Service needs criticality, determining systems criticality, impact of potential failures of critical systems, occupancy rates, usage patterns, resource availability, cost-effectiveness, and brand reputation are paramount considerations.
2. Resource Planning Metrics: Our methodology comprised assessments of resource specificity and availability, logistics bottlenecks, regional property benchmarks, operational metrics, and predictive analysis of space, energy, water, waste management, and staffing requirements.
3. Budget Estimation and Variance Analysis: We establish pre-start budgets as baselines, gauging variances using real-time inputs and conducting rigorous analytical reviews. We then use statistical methods to analyse the influences of independent variables, including business needs, seasonal fluctuations, building occupancy levels, and operational space, on resource demands such as person-hours, specialised skills, energy, water, waste, consumables, and equipment.
4. Data-Driven Efficiency Improvements: We leverage real-time data analysis to identify intervention opportunities to enhance energy and water efficiencies within the building infrastructure.
5. Stakeholder Engagement and Key Performance Indicators (KPIs): Periodic Customer Satisfaction surveys conducted after occupancy and collaborative workshops and dialogues help us set KPIs that align with our business policies and strategies.
6. Lifecycle Cost Analysis: Critical high-cost elements undergo rigorous lifecycle cost analyses, particularly in retrofit engineering interventions, digitalisation, and energy efficiency enhancement programs.
Our meticulous resource planning and budgeting approach ensures alignment with business goals while continually seeking innovative ways to optimise efficiency, sustainability, and operational effectiveness.
Resource Allocation:
Resources were categorised under three heads, Man-hours, Consumables, and Equipment, to operate and maintain the property and facility. Functional portfolios were allocated resources to support service-level requirements and end-user customer satisfaction. Detailed task analysis identified required person-hours and skill sets, in-house capabilities, and opportunities for operational efficiency improvements across portfolios. Careful consideration of implementing digitised tools into operations and maintenance services improved operations transactions and quality for clients. The target of resource optimisation was achieved by 20% compared to traditional industry practice.
Budgeting:
We used a zero-based budgeting approach for cost elements, including energy, staffing, repairs and maintenance, annual maintenance contracts, amenities services, environmental and safety audits and certifications, parking management, and property taxes. By collaborating with stakeholders and conducting workshops to deliberate on avoidable resource inputs and cross-functional service delivery models, we reduced fixed and variable occupancy costs by 10% per unit.
Howdy! This article could not be written any better!
Looking through this article reminds me of my previous roommate!
He continually kept talking about this. I’ll forward
this post to him. Pretty sure he will have a good read.
Many thanks for sharing!